![]() |
Hazleton Mayor Lou Barletta |
Regulatory 'cherry picking' is not concurrent enforcement, and it is not constitutionally permitted. ... It is, of course, not our job to sit in judgment of whether state and local frustration about federal immigration policy is warranted. We are, however, required to intervene when states and localities directly undermine the federal objectives embodied in statutes enacted by Congress. … Whether Hazleton inadvertently stumbled into this exclusively federal domain, or decided to defiantly barge in, it is clear that it has attempted to usurp authority that the Constitution has placed beyond the vicissitudes of local governments.
Letters. Vic Walczak, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union in Pennsylvania, expressed his view that the local immigration ordinances, "distracted local governments from solving the real problems that they were facing." King. But, in a recent press release, Mayor Barletta made it clear that his city's fight is "not over yet." Video: "Mayor: Illegal Immigration Fight 'Not Over Yet' " - The Associated Press.
Similar legislations are being sought by states and municipalities across America. It seems as though this barrage of local immigration laws is only just beginning.
References: Information in this article was obtained courtesy of The Philidelphia Inquirer, TheDailyReview.com, and the Associated Press. Larry King, Federal appeals court strikes down Hazleton's immigration ordinances, The Philadelphia Inquirer, Sept. 10, 2010 (“King”), and Letters, Immigration is the province of the federal gov., TheDailyReview.com, Sept. 12, 2010. (“Letters”).
No comments:
Post a Comment